| Sažetak | Diplomski rad izrađen je na Odsjeku za prirodne znanosti Fakulteta za odgojne i obrazovne znanosti u Osijeku iz predmet Prirodoslovlje 2 pod vodstvom mentorice dr. sc. Irelle Bogut, izvanredne profesorice i mentora mr. sc. Željka Popovića, profesora visoke škole. Domaće životinje su životinje koje je čovjek pripitomio i uzgojio kako bi imao gospodarsku korist od njih. Grana poljoprivrede koja se bavi uzgojem domaćih životinja naziva se stočarstvo. U ovom diplomskom radu opisane su sljedeće domaće životinje: konj, magarac, govedo, ovan, koza, svinja, pas, mačka, kunić što su ujedno sisavci, potom: kokoš, patka, guska, golub i puran koji pripadaju pticama te jedan kukac, a to je pčela. Cilj istraživanja koji sam provela u diplomskom radu jest provjeriti koliko učenici mlađe školske dobi, točnije učenici iz drugog i četvrtog razreda osnovne škole, poznaju domaće životinje. Istraživanje sam provela u gradskoj i seoskoj sredini, a rezultate koje sam dobila testom usporedila sam međusobno. Osim toga, prikazala sam rezultate analize Nacionalnog okvirnog kurikuluma, Nastavnog plana i programa za osnovne škole i udžbenika iz Prirode i društva koja koriste ispitanici. Ispitanici su bili iz dvije gradske (OŠ Frana Krste Frankopana Osijek i OŠ Augusta Šenoe Osijek) i dvije seoske škole (OŠ Ivana Kukuljevića Belišće, PŠ Veliškovci i OŠ ''Matija Gubec'' Magadenovac, PŠ Marijanci). Ukupan broj ispitanika je 131, od čega je 82 učenika iz gradskih škola i 49 učenika iz seoskih škola. Istraživanje je pokazalo kako učenici iz seoskih škola bolje prepoznaju domaće životinje nego učenici iz gradskih škola, odnosno u većini zadataka učenici iz seoskih škola ostvarili su bolje rezultate. Učenici iz gradskih škola pokazali su bolje znanje u prepoznavanju definicije domaćih životinja gdje je 96,34% učenika iz grada znalo odgovor, dok je iz sela isto znalo 89,80% učenika. Prepoznati kojoj grani poljoprivrede pripadaju domaće životinje znalo je 84,15% gradskih učenika i 69,39% seoskih učenika. U ostalim zadacima bili su bolji učenici iz seoskih škola. Posljednji dio testa, koji je bio temelj diplomskog rada, pokazao je kako su učenici iz seoskih škola bili bolji u prepoznavanju sljedećih domaćih životinja: bik (40,82%), janje (55,10%), prase (55,10%), krava (81,63%), svinja (81,63%), štene (63,27%), tele (53,06%), jarić (20,41%), kokoš (93,88%), purica (48,98%), puran (57,14%), koza (59,18%), pas (89,90%), pijetao (93,88%), mačić (79,59%), ždrijebe (46,94%), pačić (48,98%), guščić (14,29%), patka (59,18%), ovan (57,14%) i pile (83,67%). Nasuprot tome, učenici iz gradskih škola bolje su prepoznali goluba (90,24%), pčelu (84,15%), konja (93,90%), gusku (70,73%), mačku (90,24%), magare (10,98%), noja (80,49%), ovcu (82,93%) i kunića (2,44%). Istraživanje je pokazalo da učenici iz seoskih sredina pokazali bolje prepoznavanje za 21 domaću životinju. Osim toga, više učenika iz seoskih škola znalo je prepoznati korist koze, kokoši, ovce, patke, svinje, guske, konja i pčele. |
| Sažetak (engleski) | This graduation thesis was done at the Department of Natural Sciences, in the subject of Natural Sciences 2 under guidance of mentor Irella Bogut, Associate Professor, PhD and co-mentor Željko Popović, College Professor, M. Sc. Domestic animals are animals tamed for economic benefit. Domesticated animals raised in an agricultural setting to produce commodities such as food, fiber and labor are called livestock. In this diploma thesis, animals described are: horse, donkey, cattle, goats, goats, pigs, dogs, cats, rabbits who are also mammals, then chickens, ducks, goats, pigeons and turkeys belonging to birds and an insect, which is a bee. The goal of this research is to determine the knowledge of second and fourth graders about domesticated animals. The study was conducted in urban and rural environment, and I compared the results obtained with the test. In addition, I have presented the results of the analysis of the National Curriculum, the curriculum for elementary schools and textbooks from Science used by the respondents. The respondents were from two cities and two rural schools. The total number of respondents is 131, 82 pupils from urban schools and 49 pupils from rural schools. The research has shown that rural school pupils are able to recognize better domestic animals than urban school pupils are, and in most of the tasks rural school pupils have achieved better results. Urban school students demonstrated better knowledge in identifying the definition of domestic animals, where 96.34% of urban pupils knew the answer, while 89,80% of the rural school pupils knew the same. 84.15% of urban pupils and 69.39% of rural pupils knew which branch of agriculture belonged to domestic animals. Pupils from rural schools better achieved other tasks. The last part of the test, which was the foundation of this diploma thesis, showed that rural school pupils were better at recognizing the following domestic animals: bull (40.82%), lamb (55.10%), piglet (55.10%), cows (81.63%), pigs (81.63%), puppies (63.27%), calf (53.06%), kid (20.41%), chicken (93.88%), turkey-hen (48,98%), turkey-tom (57,14%), goat (59.18%), dog (89.90%), cock (93.88%), kitten (79.59%), foal (46.94%), goose (48.98%), gosling (14.29%), duck (59.18%), ram (57.14%) and chick (83.67%). By contrast, urban school pupils from have better recognized pigeons (90.24%), bees (84.15%), horses (93.90%), goose (70.73%), cat (90.24%), colt (10.98%), ostrich (80.49%), sheep (82.93%) and European rabbits (2.44%). The research has shown that students from rural environment have shown better recognition for 21 domestic animals. In addition, many rural school pupils knew the benefits of goats, chickens, sheep, ducks, pigs, geese, horses and bees. |
